adair_1989

R. Adair, L. L. Chase, and S. A. Payne, “Nonlinear refractive index of optical crystals”, Phys. Rev. B 39, 3337-3350 (1989)

Source record · Catalogue · Review register

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.39.3337

Source kind: measurement

Recorded technique: Nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), as in the authors’ glass work (Ref. 19, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 875 (1987), adair_1987, which gives the details): a 1.064-um beam (omega1) and a 1.071-um beam (omega2) from a Raman-shifted dye laser, collinear, generate 2 omega1 - omega2; offset Delta = omega1 - omega2 = 60 cm^-1 (coherence length ~10 cm, samples up to 1 cm; the samples were a few mm thick). Two nearly identical focal regions, the sample arm and a CS2 reference arm, detected through a double monochromator by S-1 photomultipliers and a two-channel gated integrator, the sample signal normalized shot by shot to the reference. Relative measurement: n2 from the signal ratio to a standard through Eq. (10), [chi1111]_s = [chi1111]_c (I_s/I_c)^(1/2) (n_s/n_c)^2 (l_c/l_s) C^2 (C^2 corrects the surface reflectivities), the standard calibrated ‘with the average of the nonlinear refractive indices of seven glass samples measured by time-resolved interferometry by Milam et al.’ (Refs. 15-18) (pp. 3339-3340). Linear polarization; bulk single crystals except AgCl (polycrystalline). The pulse duration is not stated in this paper (the text says only that the pulses are nanosecond, p. 3338; see Ref. 19).

Materials in structured entries: AgCl, Al2O3, BaF2, BeAl2O4, CaCO3, CaF2, CaMgSi2O6, CaO, CaWO4, CdF2, CdS, CeF3, Er2O3, GGG, GSAG, GSGG, Ga2O3, KBr, KCl, KDP, KF, KTP, KTaO3, LAP, LLGG, LaF3, LiF, MgAl2O4, MgF2, MgO, NaBr, NaCl, NaF, SF-58, SiO2, SiO2_quartz, SrF2, SrO, SrTiO3, TiO2, Y2O3, YAG, YAlO3, YGG, ZnO, ZnS, ZrO2

Dataset quantities: hyperpolarizability, nonlinear_index_field, refractive_index

Contents: 253 datasets; 4 formulas.

Curation notes

Journal pages 3337-3350 = pdf pages 1-14 (journal page = 3336 + pdf page). Identity checked against the first page. Every table image was compared with the extracted cells (2026-09-26): no misread cell in any of the 11 table files.

DEFINITIONS (quoted, Gaussian esu). Eq. (1), p. 3337: n = n0 + n2 <E^2>, ‘where n0 is the linear refractive index and E is the applied optical electric field’ (citing Yariv); Eq. (2), p. 3337: ‘For linearly polarized light in an isotropic medium or light polarized along a cube axis in a cubic crystal’, n2 = (12 pi / n0) chi(3)_1111. Eq. (3), p. 3337: n2 = n2(electronic) + n2(vibrational) + n2(electrostriction) + n2(thermal); p. 3338: electronic and vibrational response times ~1e-15 and 1e-13 s, electrostrictive ‘about 10^-8 s under our experimental conditions’; ‘In the propagation of nanosecond laser pulses through a medium only the first two of the mechanisms in Eq. (3) are active. These are also the only two mechanisms that contribute to our measured values of n2.’ Hence part = electronic_vibrational for the measured values (the Raman response is included; electrostriction and thermal are not). Finite Delta: ‘the use of a finite frequency difference Delta may result in the measurement of only a partial contribution to n2 arising from the Raman-active lattice vibrations’; Table I (SF-58 at Delta = 63.5-9.8 cm^-1) shows no dispersion within ~5 %, and ‘all of the crystals ... have no Raman-active vibrations below about 150 cm^-1’ (p. 3339). Eq. (4), p. 3338: the hyperpolarizability of a constituent, p_i = alpha_i E_l + gamma_i E_l^3 / 6, E_l the local field: the Taylor-series (T) convention with the local field. Eq. (5), p. 3338 (BGO): n2 = (f^4 pi / 2n) sum_i N_i gamma_i, N_i the number density, f = (n^2 + 2)/3 the Lorentz local field. Tensor, p. 3338-3339: for cubic 432, -43m, m3m crystals and a linearly polarized beam along [001] polarized at Theta to [100], Eq. (7): chi(3)(Theta) = (2 chi1122 + chi1221) + (chi1111 - 2 chi1122 - chi1221) [(cos^2(2 Theta) + 1)/2]; with Kleinman symmetry, Eq. (8), chi1122 = chi1221, Eq. (9): chi(3)(Theta) = 3 chi1122 + (chi1111 - 3 chi1122) [(cos^2(2 Theta) + 1)/2]; isotropy is r = chi1122/chi1111 = 1/3 (p. 3346). Table III footnote b: the TWM values are ‘the chi1111 component unless otherwise noted’. No circular-polarization relation is given. Table II footnote a: P_crit = c lambda^2 / (32 pi^2 n2) = 94 kW (SF-58).

ACCURACY (quoted). p. 3340: ‘we believe that the accuracy of relative n2 measurements is better than 5% for nearly all of the samples measured. Some materials (KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO, and SrO) had marginal optical quantity [sic], and the estimated errors are on the order of 15%.’ p. 3341: ‘Despite this uncertainty in the absolute values, our relative values of n2 are believed to be accurate to better than 15% based on the reproducibility and scatter of our data.’ p. 3349: ‘relative values of n2 can be measured with an accuracy of about 5%’. The absolute scale rests on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses: ‘any persistent error in the calibration set is incorporated into our results’ (p. 3340). Levels not stated.

THE n2 DATASETS (nonlinear_index_field: n = n0 + n2 <E^2>, Eq. 1, in esu; scale 1e-13 as printed; nothing converted). parameters.definition quotes Eq. (1). The tables, all in units of 10^-13 esu and checked against the images (2026-09-26): (1) Table IV (tbl_55822e89640f, p. 3342, 43 rows; continued tbl_2e1f875bba6b, p. 3343, 12 rows; both JSON-only, two header rows): columns ‘Measured n2’ (datasets n2_<row>, primary, relative uncertainty 5 % or 15 % as stated) and ‘Calculated n2’ (the BGO Eq. (6) with K = 68, formula bgo_k68; datasets n2_bgo_<row>, check). Row labels give the polarization: [100] or [110] for cubic crystals, (o)/(e) for uniaxial ones, (x+y), (y), (x+z), (gamma) for KTP, L-arginine phosphate (printed ‘L-argenine’) and YAlO3. Blank calculated cells (CeF3, CaO, SrO, Ga2O3, Er2O3, CaMgSi2O6, KTaO3) have no Abbe number. The fused silica row: n2 = 0.85 (measured), 0.83 (calculated), n = 1.4496, nu_d = 67.8; crystal quartz (o): 1.12, 1.06; (e): 1.16, 1.13. ZnS is labelled (e)/(o), so the sample was hexagonal, not the registered cubic ZnS. (2) Table I (tbl_c3b6ccc6cfdc, p. 3340): SF-58 and CS2 n2 at Delta = 63.5, 32.3, 19.8, 9.8 cm^-1 (CS2 is a liquid: skipped; SF-58: dataset n2_offset_SF-58, check, the offset as column delta). (3) Table II (tbl_0f4b0f5d826e, p. 3340): SF-58 n2 at 250, 75, 50, 12 kW, 1.064 um (dataset n2_power_SF-58, check, column power). (4) Table III (tbl_fbb684fc9121, p. 3341; 16 materials): this work’s TWM (1.06/1.07 um; ‘(av)’ after LaF3, CeF3, Al2O3 and YAG is not explained, presumably an average; Al2O3 1.25 (av) is not the mean of Table IV’s o and e values, 1.23 and 1.30, which is 1.265; this column otherwise repeats Table IV, checked by the script, so only Al2O3’s 1.25 is recorded, n2_av_Al2O3, check), and literature, all reproduced, one dataset per material and column (n2_tri_*, n2_maker_terhune_*, n2_levenson_bloembergen_*, n2_lynch_*, n2_levenson_*, n2_smith_pdf_*; a TWM column’s second wavelength is the column omega2): TRI 1.06 um (footnote c, Refs. 15 and 17: Milam and Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976); Milam, Weber and Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)), TWM 0.693/0.746 um (‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’: Maker and Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) via C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)), TWM 0.575/0.610 um (Ref. 23, Levenson and Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4447 (1974)), TWM 0.575/0.592 um (Ref. 24, Lynch, Levenson and Bloembergen, Phys. Lett. 50A, 61 (1974)), TWM 0.560/0.590 um (Ref. 25, Levenson, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-10, 110 (1974)), and PDF (power-dependent focus) 1.06 um (Ref. 27, Smith, Bechtel and Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975), the same paper as Milam 1998’s Ref. 18). Fused SiO2: 0.85 (this work), 0.95 (TRI), 1.8 (Maker-Terhune/Wang), 2.4 (Levenson 1974). The text (p. 3341) says Maker and Terhune’s values are ‘consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ and Levenson’s ‘roughly a factor of 3 larger ... except for CdF2’. (5) Table VIII (tbl_8652b8e99339, p. 3347, 13 cubic crystals): n2 with the polarization along [100], propagation along [001] (footnote a); datasets n2_table8_*, check (the same measurements as Table IV, recorded so that the three differing cells are in the data). (6) Table X (tbl_5192778e0ba3, p. 3348, 11 complex oxides): n (1.06 um, rounded Table IV values), n2 measured (= Table IV) and n2 ‘calculated from simple oxides’ by additivity of the Table IX pair hyperpolarizabilities through Eq. (5) (average error 13 % with the Lorentz field, 17 % with f = 1, p. 3349); BeAl2O4 and GSAG have no calculated value (footnote a: the BeO and Sc2/3O gammas were extrapolated from them); datasets n2_additivity_*, check; the measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script). refractiveindex.info’s ‘Adair’ n2 pages of Al2O3 (o, e), BaF2, CaF2, LiF, MgF2, SiO2 and YAG are this paper’s Table IV esu values converted by n2[m2/W] = 40 pi n2[esu]/(c n0) with Table IV’s n (agreement 0.2-1.6 %, rounding), although they cite Ref. 19 (the 1987 glasses paper); its BK7 page is from Ref. 19 (BK7 is not in this paper).

FINDINGS BETWEEN TABLES (images checked). Table VIII prints KBr 3.07 against Table IV/III 2.93; CaO 5.07 against Table IV 5.20 (5.07 is Table IV’s SrO[110]); MgO 1.6 against 1.61. Which of each pair is right is not decidable from the paper, so no erratum: both are recorded (Table IV primary, Table VIII check) and the dataset notes say so. Table X prints ‘Gd3Sc2Al2O12’ against Table IV and the text (p. 3347) ‘Gd3Sc2Al3O12’ (GSAG; a misprint of the formula in Table X, mapped to GSAG by the script; its n2 equals Table IV’s GSAG row). Table IX’s header prints ‘gamma(MxO < MxS’ for ‘gamma(MxO, MxS)’. The text (p. 3346) quotes r = 0.46 (LiF), 0.45 (NaF), 0.29 (KF), 0.56 (CaF2), 0.60 (SrF2), 0.66 (BaF2), 0.31 (CdF2), consistent with Table VIII.

TABLE VIII RATIOS (not recorded: no quantity for a ratio of chi(3) components). chi1122/chi1111 from the polarization anisotropy of n2 via Eq. (9), assuming chi1122 = chi1221 (footnote b), this work (footnote c), e.g. CaF2 0.556 +- 0.020, BaF2 0.658 +- 0.008, MgO 0.482 +- 0.025, LiF 0.460 +- 0.017; the last column reproduces Ref. 2 (Maker and Terhune 1965; LiF, NaCl, KCl, KBr, CaF2, MgO) and Ref. 23 (Levenson and Bloembergen 1974; CaF2, SrF2, CdF2, BaF2).

HYPERPOLARIZABILITIES. Tables V (gamma_expt), VII and IX: gamma per neutral formula unit containing one anion (LiF, Mg1/2F, La1/3F, Al2/3O, Si1/2O, ZnS ...), in 10^-39 esu, from the measured n2 through Eq. (5), assuming the anion dominates (gamma+ << gamma-). Convention T with the Lorentz local field (Eq. 4). Wavelength 1.064 um (the TWM fundamental; Table V’s header says 1.06 um). They are use = check: a model reduction of the n2, not an independent measurement. Table VII repeats Table V’s LiF, NaF, KF (141, 320, 889; checked equal by the script), taken once. Table IX’s BeO (436.0, footnote b ‘Obtained from BeAl2O4 and Al2O3 assuming additivity’) and Sc2/3O (920.0, from GSAG, p. 3347) are pair values, not a crystal’s gamma: not recorded. Check (computed 2026-09-26): with Eq. (5), n = 1.4496 and an assumed fused-silica density of 2.20 g/cm3 (not stated in the paper; N(O) = 4.41e22 cm^-3), gamma = 510e-39 esu per Si1/2O gives n2 = 0.851e-13 esu, Table IV’s 0.85: the table’s gamma is per oxygen, with N the oxygen density. Table V’s theory: the in-crystal alpha+, alpha-, gamma+, gamma- of Johnson, Subbaswammy and Senatore (Ref. 12) for 16 alkali halides are NOT transcribed (per-ion values of an LDA theory; no per-material quantity); only the ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’ column of the 7 crystals measured here is recorded, as reproduced. The alkali halides that appear only in those theory columns (RbF, LiCl, RbCl, LiBr, RbBr, LiI, NaI, KI, RbI) are not registered.

LINEAR INDEX. Table IV’s ‘n (1.06 um)’ column is recorded per row (refractive_index, reproduced from the handbook of each footnote, Refs. 29-39); Table X’s n repeats it rounded and is not recorded. The Abbe numbers nu_d (Table IV) have no quantity: quoted in each dataset’s notes. Eq. (6) uses n_d (587.56 nm) whereas Table IV prints n at 1.06 um.

FIGURES (not digitised): Fig. 2 (p. 3343), measured n2 against n (log scales); Fig. 3 (p. 3343), measured against BGO-calculated n2, with K = 68 and K = 48 lines; Fig. 4 (p. 3345), Johnson et al.’s ln alpha- and ln gamma- against R^-2; Figs. 5 and 6 (pp. 3346, 3348), measured gamma per F and per O against R^-2 (CdF2 and the d-shell oxides off the line).

Recorded bibliographic identity status: VALIDATED_WITH_WARNINGS. This concerns identification of the source; it does not establish the scientific correctness of its contents.

Datasets

adair_1989/n_LiF

{
  "id": "n_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 98.0. Row ‘LiF[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_NaF

{
  "id": "n_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__n_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 85.2. Row ‘NaF[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_KF

{
  "id": "n_KF",
  "material": "KF",
  "file": "KF/adair_1989__n_KF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 97.9. Row ‘KF[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_NaCl

{
  "id": "n_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__n_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 42.9. Row ‘NaCl[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_KCl

{
  "id": "n_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__n_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 44.1. Row ‘KCl[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_NaBr

{
  "id": "n_NaBr",
  "material": "NaBr",
  "file": "NaBr/adair_1989__n_NaBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 31.7. Row ‘NaBr[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_KBr

{
  "id": "n_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__n_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 33.7. Row ‘KBr[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_MgF2_o

{
  "id": "n_MgF2_o",
  "material": "MgF2",
  "file": "MgF2/adair_1989__n_MgF2_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 104.9.

adair_1989/n_CaF2

{
  "id": "n_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 95.1. Row ‘CaF_2[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_SrF2

{
  "id": "n_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__n_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 93.9. Row ‘SrF_2[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_CdF2

{
  "id": "n_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__n_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "Gan Fu-Xi and Lin Feng-Ying, Wuli 8, 385 (1979) [Ref. 32]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote d: reproduced from Ref. 32. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 61.0. Row ‘CdF_2[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_BaF2

{
  "id": "n_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__n_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 81.8. Row ‘BaF_2[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_LaF3_o

{
  "id": "n_LaF3_o",
  "material": "LaF3",
  "file": "LaF3/adair_1989__n_LaF3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 57.0.

adair_1989/n_CeF3_o

{
  "id": "n_CeF3_o",
  "material": "CeF3",
  "file": "CeF3/adair_1989__n_CeF3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. No Abbe number printed. Printed ‘~1.6’ (the tilde is in the table image): an approximate value; the tilde is kept in the printed column.

adair_1989/n_AgCl

{
  "id": "n_AgCl",
  "material": "AgCl",
  "file": "AgCl/adair_1989__n_AgCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 21.2. The sample is polycrystalline (‘AgCl (polycryst.)’).

adair_1989/n_MgO

{
  "id": "n_MgO",
  "material": "MgO",
  "file": "MgO/adair_1989__n_MgO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 53.4. Row ‘MgO[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_CaO

{
  "id": "n_CaO",
  "material": "CaO",
  "file": "CaO/adair_1989__n_CaO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 62nd ed., edited by R. C. Weast (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1981), Sec. B [Ref. 33]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote e: reproduced from Ref. 33. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. No Abbe number printed. Row ‘CaO[100]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [100] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_SrO

{
  "id": "n_SrO",
  "material": "SrO",
  "file": "SrO/adair_1989__n_SrO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 62nd ed., edited by R. C. Weast (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1981), Sec. B [Ref. 33]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote e: reproduced from Ref. 33. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. No Abbe number printed. Row ‘SrO[110]’: the n2 was measured with the polarization along [110] (column 1 gives ‘the material and polarization geometry’, p. 3341); a cubic crystal’s index does not depend on it.

adair_1989/n_ZnO_e

{
  "id": "n_ZnO_e",
  "material": "ZnO",
  "file": "ZnO/adair_1989__n_ZnO_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 11.6.

adair_1989/n_ZnO_o

{
  "id": "n_ZnO_o",
  "material": "ZnO",
  "file": "ZnO/adair_1989__n_ZnO_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 12.3.

adair_1989/n_Al2O3_o

{
  "id": "n_Al2O3_o",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__n_Al2O3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 71.8.

adair_1989/n_Al2O3_e

{
  "id": "n_Al2O3_e",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__n_Al2O3_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 75.2.

adair_1989/n_Ga2O3

{
  "id": "n_Ga2O3",
  "material": "Ga2O3",
  "file": "Ga2O3/adair_1989__n_Ga2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. No Abbe number printed. The phase and the polarization are not stated.

adair_1989/n_Y2O3

{
  "id": "n_Y2O3",
  "material": "Y2O3",
  "file": "Y2O3/adair_1989__n_Y2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "H. H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 329 (1976) [Ref. 29]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote a: reproduced from Ref. 29. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 37.5.

adair_1989/n_Er2O3

{
  "id": "n_Er2O3",
  "material": "Er2O3",
  "file": "Er2O3/adair_1989__n_Er2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "T. Marcinov and K. Truszkowska, Appl. Opt. 20, 1755 (1981) [Ref. 34]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote f: reproduced from Ref. 34. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. No Abbe number printed.

adair_1989/n_SiO2

{
  "id": "n_SiO2",
  "material": "SiO2",
  "file": "SiO2/adair_1989__n_SiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 67.8. ‘SiO2 (fused)’; the grade is not stated.

adair_1989/n_SiO2_quartz_o

{
  "id": "n_SiO2_quartz_o",
  "material": "SiO2_quartz",
  "file": "SiO2_quartz/adair_1989__n_SiO2_quartz_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 71.6.

adair_1989/n_SiO2_quartz_e

{
  "id": "n_SiO2_quartz_e",
  "material": "SiO2_quartz",
  "file": "SiO2_quartz/adair_1989__n_SiO2_quartz_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 70.1.

adair_1989/n_TiO2

{
  "id": "n_TiO2",
  "material": "TiO2",
  "file": "TiO2/adair_1989__n_TiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 9.8. The phase and the polarization are not stated.

adair_1989/n_ZrO2

{
  "id": "n_ZrO2",
  "material": "ZrO2",
  "file": "ZrO2/adair_1989__n_ZrO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 35.8. The phase and the polarization are not stated.

adair_1989/n_BeAl2O4

{
  "id": "n_BeAl2O4",
  "material": "BeAl2O4",
  "file": "BeAl2O4/adair_1989__n_BeAl2O4.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 72.5. The polarization is not stated.

adair_1989/n_MgAl2O4

{
  "id": "n_MgAl2O4",
  "material": "MgAl2O4",
  "file": "MgAl2O4/adair_1989__n_MgAl2O4.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 60.6.

adair_1989/n_CaMgSi2O6

{
  "id": "n_CaMgSi2O6",
  "material": "CaMgSi2O6",
  "file": "CaMgSi2O6/adair_1989__n_CaMgSi2O6.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 38th ed., edited by Charles D. Hodgman (Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, 1956), p. 1423 [Ref. 35]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote g: reproduced from Ref. 35. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. No Abbe number printed. The polarization is not stated.

adair_1989/n_YAlO3_gamma

{
  "id": "n_YAlO3_gamma",
  "material": "YAlO3",
  "file": "YAlO3/adair_1989__n_YAlO3_gamma.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "polarization": "gamma"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 51.2. Printed ‘YAlO3 (gamma)’: presumably the n_gamma (n_g) principal index, an inference the paper does not state, so no axis is set.

adair_1989/n_YAG

{
  "id": "n_YAG",
  "material": "YAG",
  "file": "YAG/adair_1989__n_YAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 52.4.

adair_1989/n_GSAG

{
  "id": "n_GSAG",
  "material": "GSAG",
  "file": "GSAG/adair_1989__n_GSAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. K. Tien, R. J. Martin, S. L. Blank, S. H. Temple, and L. J. Varrerin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 21, 207 (1972) [Ref. 36]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote h: reproduced from Ref. 36. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 48.0.

adair_1989/n_GSGG

{
  "id": "n_GSGG",
  "material": "GSGG",
  "file": "GSGG/adair_1989__n_GSGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. A. Balabanova, E. V. Zharikov, V. V. Laptev, and V. D. Shigorin, Kristallografiya 29, 1201 (1984) [Sov. Phys.-Crystallogr. 29, 704 (1984)] [Ref. 37]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote i: reproduced from Ref. 37. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 37.3.

adair_1989/n_GGG

{
  "id": "n_GGG",
  "material": "GGG",
  "file": "GGG/adair_1989__n_GGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 37.6.

adair_1989/n_YGG

{
  "id": "n_YGG",
  "material": "YGG",
  "file": "YGG/adair_1989__n_YGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "K. Enke and W. Tolksdorf, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 49, 1625 (1978) [Ref. 38]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote j: reproduced from Ref. 38. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 40.0.

adair_1989/n_LLGG

{
  "id": "n_LLGG",
  "material": "LLGG",
  "file": "LLGG/adair_1989__n_LLGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. A. Balabanova, E. V. Zharikov, V. V. Laptev, and V. D. Shigorin, Kristallografiya 29, 1201 (1984) [Sov. Phys.-Crystallogr. 29, 704 (1984)] [Ref. 37]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote i: reproduced from Ref. 37. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 36.4.

adair_1989/n_SrTiO3

{
  "id": "n_SrTiO3",
  "material": "SrTiO3",
  "file": "SrTiO3/adair_1989__n_SrTiO3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 13.6.

adair_1989/n_CaCO3_o

{
  "id": "n_CaCO3_o",
  "material": "CaCO3",
  "file": "CaCO3/adair_1989__n_CaCO3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 47.6.

adair_1989/n_CaCO3_e

{
  "id": "n_CaCO3_e",
  "material": "CaCO3",
  "file": "CaCO3/adair_1989__n_CaCO3_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 76.8.

adair_1989/n_KDP_o

{
  "id": "n_KDP_o",
  "material": "KDP",
  "file": "KDP/adair_1989__n_KDP_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 70.9.

adair_1989/n_KDP_e

{
  "id": "n_KDP_e",
  "material": "KDP",
  "file": "KDP/adair_1989__n_KDP_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 56.6.

adair_1989/n_KTP_xy

{
  "id": "n_KTP_xy",
  "material": "KTP",
  "file": "KTP/adair_1989__n_KTP_xy.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Eimerl (private communication) [Ref. 39]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "polarization": "x+y"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote k: reproduced from Ref. 39. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 23.5. Printed ‘K(TiO)PO4 (x + y)’: not one principal axis (the paper does not define x + y further), so no axis is set.

adair_1989/n_LAP_y

{
  "id": "n_LAP_y",
  "material": "LAP",
  "file": "LAP/adair_1989__n_LAP_y.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Eimerl (private communication) [Ref. 39]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "y"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote k: reproduced from Ref. 39. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 47.5. Printed ‘L-argenine phosphate (y)’ (sic, in the table image); polarization along y, taken as the principal axis y of the registered material.

adair_1989/n_LAP_xz

{
  "id": "n_LAP_xz",
  "material": "LAP",
  "file": "LAP/adair_1989__n_LAP_xz.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Eimerl (private communication) [Ref. 39]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "polarization": "x+z"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote k: reproduced from Ref. 39. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 50.0. Printed ‘L-argenine phosphate (x + z)’ (sic); not one principal axis, so no axis is set.

adair_1989/n_KTaO3

{
  "id": "n_KTaO3",
  "material": "KTaO3",
  "file": "KTaO3/adair_1989__n_KTaO3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. No Abbe number printed.

adair_1989/n_CaWO4_o

{
  "id": "n_CaWO4_o",
  "material": "CaWO4",
  "file": "CaWO4/adair_1989__n_CaWO4_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 30.0.

adair_1989/n_CaWO4_e

{
  "id": "n_CaWO4_e",
  "material": "CaWO4",
  "file": "CaWO4/adair_1989__n_CaWO4_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 28.0.

adair_1989/n_ZnS_e

{
  "id": "n_ZnS_e",
  "material": "ZnS",
  "file": "ZnS/adair_1989__n_ZnS_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "polarization": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 15.5. Printed ‘ZnS (e)’: a uniaxial (hexagonal) ZnS, whereas the registered ZnS is isotropic (cubic), so no axis is set; the label is kept in polarization.

adair_1989/n_ZnS_o

{
  "id": "n_ZnS_o",
  "material": "ZnS",
  "file": "ZnS/adair_1989__n_ZnS_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. J. Dodge, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Sec. 1.1.1.2 [Ref. 30]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "polarization": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote b: reproduced from Ref. 30. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 15.5. Printed ‘ZnS (o)’: a uniaxial (hexagonal) ZnS, whereas the registered ZnS is isotropic (cubic), so no axis is set; the label is kept in polarization.

adair_1989/n_CdS_e

{
  "id": "n_CdS_e",
  "material": "CdS",
  "file": "CdS/adair_1989__n_CdS_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 3.8.

adair_1989/n_CdS_o

{
  "id": "n_CdS_o",
  "material": "CdS",
  "file": "CdS/adair_1989__n_CdS_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "refractive_index",
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "S. Singh, in Handbook of Laser Science and Technology, edited by M. J. Weber (Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, 1986), Vol. 3, Pt. 1, Sec. 1.1 [Ref. 31]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "form": "bulk",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (continued) (p. 3343), column ‘n (1.06 um)’, footnote c: reproduced from Ref. 31. The index Adair et al. used with this row’s n2. Abbe number nu_d printed 4.4.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_LiF

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__gamma_expt_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column gamma_expt (‘Comparison with experiment at 1.06 um’). Per neutral formula unit with one anion (LiF), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. For the alkali halides the n2 ‘averaged over the [100] and [110] polarizations’ was used (p. 3344). Table VII (p. 3346) repeats the value (checked equal by the script).

adair_1989/gamma_theory_LiF

{
  "id": "gamma_theory_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__gamma_theory_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Johnson, K. R. Subbaswammy, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9202 (1987) [Ref. 12], extrapolated to 1.06 um with their formula (Table V, footnote a)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’: the LDA (pseudopotential) theory of Johnson et al. (Ref. 12), gamma = gamma+ + gamma- in the crystal, ‘extrapolated to lambda = 1.06 um using their formula’ (footnote a); computed for omega = 0, with the frequency correction of Ref. 12 applied (p. 3345). Per formula unit, 10^-39 esu, the same convention as the measured column. The table does not say whether Adair et al. or Johnson et al. made the extrapolation.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_NaF

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__gamma_expt_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column gamma_expt (‘Comparison with experiment at 1.06 um’). Per neutral formula unit with one anion (NaF), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. For the alkali halides the n2 ‘averaged over the [100] and [110] polarizations’ was used (p. 3344). Table VII (p. 3346) repeats the value (checked equal by the script).

adair_1989/gamma_theory_NaF

{
  "id": "gamma_theory_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__gamma_theory_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Johnson, K. R. Subbaswammy, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9202 (1987) [Ref. 12], extrapolated to 1.06 um with their formula (Table V, footnote a)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’: the LDA (pseudopotential) theory of Johnson et al. (Ref. 12), gamma = gamma+ + gamma- in the crystal, ‘extrapolated to lambda = 1.06 um using their formula’ (footnote a); computed for omega = 0, with the frequency correction of Ref. 12 applied (p. 3345). Per formula unit, 10^-39 esu, the same convention as the measured column. The table does not say whether Adair et al. or Johnson et al. made the extrapolation.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_KF

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_KF",
  "material": "KF",
  "file": "KF/adair_1989__gamma_expt_KF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column gamma_expt (‘Comparison with experiment at 1.06 um’). Per neutral formula unit with one anion (KF), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. For the alkali halides the n2 ‘averaged over the [100] and [110] polarizations’ was used (p. 3344). Table VII (p. 3346) repeats the value (checked equal by the script).

adair_1989/gamma_theory_KF

{
  "id": "gamma_theory_KF",
  "material": "KF",
  "file": "KF/adair_1989__gamma_theory_KF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Johnson, K. R. Subbaswammy, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9202 (1987) [Ref. 12], extrapolated to 1.06 um with their formula (Table V, footnote a)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’: the LDA (pseudopotential) theory of Johnson et al. (Ref. 12), gamma = gamma+ + gamma- in the crystal, ‘extrapolated to lambda = 1.06 um using their formula’ (footnote a); computed for omega = 0, with the frequency correction of Ref. 12 applied (p. 3345). Per formula unit, 10^-39 esu, the same convention as the measured column. The table does not say whether Adair et al. or Johnson et al. made the extrapolation.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_NaCl

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__gamma_expt_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column gamma_expt (‘Comparison with experiment at 1.06 um’). Per neutral formula unit with one anion (NaCl), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. For the alkali halides the n2 ‘averaged over the [100] and [110] polarizations’ was used (p. 3344).

adair_1989/gamma_theory_NaCl

{
  "id": "gamma_theory_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__gamma_theory_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Johnson, K. R. Subbaswammy, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9202 (1987) [Ref. 12], extrapolated to 1.06 um with their formula (Table V, footnote a)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’: the LDA (pseudopotential) theory of Johnson et al. (Ref. 12), gamma = gamma+ + gamma- in the crystal, ‘extrapolated to lambda = 1.06 um using their formula’ (footnote a); computed for omega = 0, with the frequency correction of Ref. 12 applied (p. 3345). Per formula unit, 10^-39 esu, the same convention as the measured column. The table does not say whether Adair et al. or Johnson et al. made the extrapolation.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_KCl

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__gamma_expt_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column gamma_expt (‘Comparison with experiment at 1.06 um’). Per neutral formula unit with one anion (KCl), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. For the alkali halides the n2 ‘averaged over the [100] and [110] polarizations’ was used (p. 3344).

adair_1989/gamma_theory_KCl

{
  "id": "gamma_theory_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__gamma_theory_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Johnson, K. R. Subbaswammy, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9202 (1987) [Ref. 12], extrapolated to 1.06 um with their formula (Table V, footnote a)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’: the LDA (pseudopotential) theory of Johnson et al. (Ref. 12), gamma = gamma+ + gamma- in the crystal, ‘extrapolated to lambda = 1.06 um using their formula’ (footnote a); computed for omega = 0, with the frequency correction of Ref. 12 applied (p. 3345). Per formula unit, 10^-39 esu, the same convention as the measured column. The table does not say whether Adair et al. or Johnson et al. made the extrapolation.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_NaBr

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_NaBr",
  "material": "NaBr",
  "file": "NaBr/adair_1989__gamma_expt_NaBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column gamma_expt (‘Comparison with experiment at 1.06 um’). Per neutral formula unit with one anion (NaBr), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. For the alkali halides the n2 ‘averaged over the [100] and [110] polarizations’ was used (p. 3344).

adair_1989/gamma_theory_NaBr

{
  "id": "gamma_theory_NaBr",
  "material": "NaBr",
  "file": "NaBr/adair_1989__gamma_theory_NaBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Johnson, K. R. Subbaswammy, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9202 (1987) [Ref. 12], extrapolated to 1.06 um with their formula (Table V, footnote a)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’: the LDA (pseudopotential) theory of Johnson et al. (Ref. 12), gamma = gamma+ + gamma- in the crystal, ‘extrapolated to lambda = 1.06 um using their formula’ (footnote a); computed for omega = 0, with the frequency correction of Ref. 12 applied (p. 3345). Per formula unit, 10^-39 esu, the same convention as the measured column. The table does not say whether Adair et al. or Johnson et al. made the extrapolation.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_KBr

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__gamma_expt_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column gamma_expt (‘Comparison with experiment at 1.06 um’). Per neutral formula unit with one anion (KBr), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. For the alkali halides the n2 ‘averaged over the [100] and [110] polarizations’ was used (p. 3344).

adair_1989/gamma_theory_KBr

{
  "id": "gamma_theory_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__gamma_theory_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_62267fd0462a",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Johnson, K. R. Subbaswammy, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9202 (1987) [Ref. 12], extrapolated to 1.06 um with their formula (Table V, footnote a)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic"
  }
}

Table V (p. 3344), column ‘gamma_theory (adjusted)’: the LDA (pseudopotential) theory of Johnson et al. (Ref. 12), gamma = gamma+ + gamma- in the crystal, ‘extrapolated to lambda = 1.06 um using their formula’ (footnote a); computed for omega = 0, with the frequency correction of Ref. 12 applied (p. 3345). Per formula unit, 10^-39 esu, the same convention as the measured column. The table does not say whether Adair et al. or Johnson et al. made the extrapolation.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_MgF2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_MgF2",
  "material": "MgF2",
  "file": "MgF2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_MgF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_00fcb404f207",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VII (p. 3346), formula unit Mg1/2F. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Mg1/2F), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation (nearest-neighbour) separation in angstrom, from Ref. 50 (Galasso) unless footnoted. The separation carries footnote b (Ref. 51, Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_CaF2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_00fcb404f207",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VII (p. 3346), formula unit Ca1/2F. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Ca1/2F), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation (nearest-neighbour) separation in angstrom, from Ref. 50 (Galasso) unless footnoted.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_SrF2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_00fcb404f207",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VII (p. 3346), formula unit Sr1/2F. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Sr1/2F), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation (nearest-neighbour) separation in angstrom, from Ref. 50 (Galasso) unless footnoted.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_CdF2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_00fcb404f207",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VII (p. 3346), formula unit Cd1/2F. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Cd1/2F), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation (nearest-neighbour) separation in angstrom, from Ref. 50 (Galasso) unless footnoted.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_BaF2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_00fcb404f207",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VII (p. 3346), formula unit Ba1/2F. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Ba1/2F), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation (nearest-neighbour) separation in angstrom, from Ref. 50 (Galasso) unless footnoted.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_LaF3

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_LaF3",
  "material": "LaF3",
  "file": "LaF3/adair_1989__gamma_expt_LaF3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_00fcb404f207",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VII (p. 3346), formula unit La1/3F. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (La1/3F), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation (nearest-neighbour) separation in angstrom, from Ref. 50 (Galasso) unless footnoted. The separation carries footnote c (Ref. 52, Carnall et al., private communication).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_CeF3

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_CeF3",
  "material": "CeF3",
  "file": "CeF3/adair_1989__gamma_expt_CeF3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_00fcb404f207",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VII (p. 3346), formula unit Ce1/3F. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Ce1/3F), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation (nearest-neighbour) separation in angstrom, from Ref. 50 (Galasso) unless footnoted. The separation carries footnote d: ‘Extrapolated from LaF3 by correcting for density’.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_MgO

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_MgO",
  "material": "MgO",
  "file": "MgO/adair_1989__gamma_expt_MgO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit MgO. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (MgO), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_CaO

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_CaO",
  "material": "CaO",
  "file": "CaO/adair_1989__gamma_expt_CaO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit CaO. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (CaO), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_ZnO

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_ZnO",
  "material": "ZnO",
  "file": "ZnO/adair_1989__gamma_expt_ZnO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit ZnO. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (ZnO), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_SrO

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_SrO",
  "material": "SrO",
  "file": "SrO/adair_1989__gamma_expt_SrO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit SrO. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (SrO), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_Al2O3

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_Al2O3",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__gamma_expt_Al2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit Al2/3O. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Al2/3O), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_Ga2O3

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_Ga2O3",
  "material": "Ga2O3",
  "file": "Ga2O3/adair_1989__gamma_expt_Ga2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit Ga2/3O. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Ga2/3O), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_Y2O3

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_Y2O3",
  "material": "Y2O3",
  "file": "Y2O3/adair_1989__gamma_expt_Y2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit Y2/3O. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Y2/3O), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_Er2O3

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_Er2O3",
  "material": "Er2O3",
  "file": "Er2O3/adair_1989__gamma_expt_Er2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit Er2/3O. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Er2/3O), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt). Footnote c on the separation: ‘Obtained from Y2O3 by correcting for density’; footnote d on the value: ‘We have assumed Er2/3O, Gd2/3O, La2/3O, and Lu2/3O have the same hyperpolarizability’ (the assumption used for the garnets of Table X).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_SiO2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_SiO2",
  "material": "SiO2",
  "file": "SiO2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_SiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit fused Si1/2O. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (fused Si1/2O), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt). Printed ‘fused Si1/2O’: the fused-silica sample of Table IV.

adair_1989/gamma_expt_TiO2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_TiO2",
  "material": "TiO2",
  "file": "TiO2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_TiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit Ti1/2O. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Ti1/2O), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_ZrO2

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_ZrO2",
  "material": "ZrO2",
  "file": "ZrO2/adair_1989__gamma_expt_ZrO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit Zr1/2O. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (Zr1/2O), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_ZnS

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_ZnS",
  "material": "ZnS",
  "file": "ZnS/adair_1989__gamma_expt_ZnS.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit ZnS. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (ZnS), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt). The unit is ZnS (one sulfur anion); Adair’s ZnS is uniaxial (Table IV (e), (o) rows).

adair_1989/gamma_expt_CdS

{
  "id": "gamma_expt_CdS",
  "material": "CdS",
  "file": "CdS/adair_1989__gamma_expt_CdS.csv",
  "table": "tbl_152efc508e07",
  "quantity": "hyperpolarizability",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-39,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "separation": "angstrom"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "process": "kerr",
    "convention": "T",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM)",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IX (p. 3347), formula unit CdS. Per neutral formula unit with one anion (CdS), in 10^-39 esu, derived by the authors from their measured n2 through Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field f = (n^2 + 2)/3 and N the number density of formula units (p. 3338; assumption gamma+ << gamma-, pp. 3344, 3346-3347). The n2 is the measurement (the n2_* datasets of this record); this gamma is a model-dependent reduction of it, hence use = check. The extra column is the anion-cation separation in angstrom, from Ref. 51 (Shannon and Prewitt). The unit is CdS (one sulfur anion); Adair’s CdS is uniaxial (Table IV (e), (o) rows).

adair_1989/n2_LiF

{
  "id": "n2_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n2_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘LiF[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_LiF

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n2_bgo_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘LiF[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_NaF

{
  "id": "n2_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__n2_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘NaF[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_NaF

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__n2_bgo_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘NaF[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_KF

{
  "id": "n2_KF",
  "material": "KF",
  "file": "KF/adair_1989__n2_KF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.15,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘KF[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_KF

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_KF",
  "material": "KF",
  "file": "KF/adair_1989__n2_bgo_KF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘KF[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_NaCl

{
  "id": "n2_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__n2_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘NaCl[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_NaCl

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__n2_bgo_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘NaCl[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_KCl

{
  "id": "n2_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__n2_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.15,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘KCl[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_KCl

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__n2_bgo_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘KCl[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_NaBr

{
  "id": "n2_NaBr",
  "material": "NaBr",
  "file": "NaBr/adair_1989__n2_NaBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.15,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘NaBr[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_NaBr

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_NaBr",
  "material": "NaBr",
  "file": "NaBr/adair_1989__n2_bgo_NaBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘NaBr[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_KBr

{
  "id": "n2_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__n2_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.15,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘KBr[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_KBr

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__n2_bgo_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘KBr[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_MgF2_o

{
  "id": "n2_MgF2_o",
  "material": "MgF2",
  "file": "MgF2/adair_1989__n2_MgF2_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘MgF_2 (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_MgF2_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_MgF2_o",
  "material": "MgF2",
  "file": "MgF2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_MgF2_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘MgF_2 (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaF_2[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaF_2[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_SrF2

{
  "id": "n2_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__n2_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SrF_2[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_SrF2

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SrF_2[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CdF2

{
  "id": "n2_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__n2_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CdF_2[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CdF2

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CdF_2[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_BaF2

{
  "id": "n2_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__n2_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘BaF_2[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_BaF2

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘BaF_2[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_LaF3_o

{
  "id": "n2_LaF3_o",
  "material": "LaF3",
  "file": "LaF3/adair_1989__n2_LaF3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘LaF_3 (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_LaF3_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_LaF3_o",
  "material": "LaF3",
  "file": "LaF3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_LaF3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘LaF_3 (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CeF3_o

{
  "id": "n2_CeF3_o",
  "material": "CeF3",
  "file": "CeF3/adair_1989__n2_CeF3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CeF_3 (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_AgCl

{
  "id": "n2_AgCl",
  "material": "AgCl",
  "file": "AgCl/adair_1989__n2_AgCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘AgCl (polycryst.)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes). Polycrystalline sample.

adair_1989/n2_bgo_AgCl

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_AgCl",
  "material": "AgCl",
  "file": "AgCl/adair_1989__n2_bgo_AgCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘AgCl (polycryst.)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_MgO

{
  "id": "n2_MgO",
  "material": "MgO",
  "file": "MgO/adair_1989__n2_MgO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘MgO[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_MgO

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_MgO",
  "material": "MgO",
  "file": "MgO/adair_1989__n2_bgo_MgO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘MgO[100]’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CaO

{
  "id": "n2_CaO",
  "material": "CaO",
  "file": "CaO/adair_1989__n2_CaO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.15,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaO[100]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_SrO

{
  "id": "n2_SrO",
  "material": "SrO",
  "file": "SrO/adair_1989__n2_SrO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.15,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [110]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SrO[110]’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_ZnO_e

{
  "id": "n2_ZnO_e",
  "material": "ZnO",
  "file": "ZnO/adair_1989__n2_ZnO_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "e",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘ZnO (e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_ZnO_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_ZnO_e",
  "material": "ZnO",
  "file": "ZnO/adair_1989__n2_bgo_ZnO_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘ZnO (e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_ZnO_o

{
  "id": "n2_ZnO_o",
  "material": "ZnO",
  "file": "ZnO/adair_1989__n2_ZnO_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘ZnO (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_ZnO_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_ZnO_o",
  "material": "ZnO",
  "file": "ZnO/adair_1989__n2_bgo_ZnO_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘ZnO (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_Al2O3_o

{
  "id": "n2_Al2O3_o",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__n2_Al2O3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Al_2O_3 (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_Al2O3_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_Al2O3_o",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_Al2O3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Al_2O_3 (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_Al2O3_e

{
  "id": "n2_Al2O3_e",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__n2_Al2O3_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "e",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Al_2O_3 (e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_Al2O3_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_Al2O3_e",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_Al2O3_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Al_2O_3 (e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_Ga2O3

{
  "id": "n2_Ga2O3",
  "material": "Ga2O3",
  "file": "Ga2O3/adair_1989__n2_Ga2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Ga_2O_3’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_Y2O3

{
  "id": "n2_Y2O3",
  "material": "Y2O3",
  "file": "Y2O3/adair_1989__n2_Y2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Y_2O_3’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_Y2O3

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_Y2O3",
  "material": "Y2O3",
  "file": "Y2O3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_Y2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Y_2O_3’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_Er2O3

{
  "id": "n2_Er2O3",
  "material": "Er2O3",
  "file": "Er2O3/adair_1989__n2_Er2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Er_2O_3’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_SiO2

{
  "id": "n2_SiO2",
  "material": "SiO2",
  "file": "SiO2/adair_1989__n2_SiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SiO_2 (fused)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_SiO2

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_SiO2",
  "material": "SiO2",
  "file": "SiO2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_SiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SiO_2 (fused)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_SiO2_quartz_o

{
  "id": "n2_SiO2_quartz_o",
  "material": "SiO2_quartz",
  "file": "SiO2_quartz/adair_1989__n2_SiO2_quartz_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SiO_2 (quartz) (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_SiO2_quartz_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_SiO2_quartz_o",
  "material": "SiO2_quartz",
  "file": "SiO2_quartz/adair_1989__n2_bgo_SiO2_quartz_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SiO_2 (quartz) (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_SiO2_quartz_e

{
  "id": "n2_SiO2_quartz_e",
  "material": "SiO2_quartz",
  "file": "SiO2_quartz/adair_1989__n2_SiO2_quartz_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "e",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SiO_2 (quartz) (e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_SiO2_quartz_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_SiO2_quartz_e",
  "material": "SiO2_quartz",
  "file": "SiO2_quartz/adair_1989__n2_bgo_SiO2_quartz_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SiO_2 (quartz) (e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_TiO2

{
  "id": "n2_TiO2",
  "material": "TiO2",
  "file": "TiO2/adair_1989__n2_TiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘TiO_2’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_TiO2

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_TiO2",
  "material": "TiO2",
  "file": "TiO2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_TiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘TiO_2’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_ZrO2

{
  "id": "n2_ZrO2",
  "material": "ZrO2",
  "file": "ZrO2/adair_1989__n2_ZrO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘ZrO_2’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_ZrO2

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_ZrO2",
  "material": "ZrO2",
  "file": "ZrO2/adair_1989__n2_bgo_ZrO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘ZrO_2’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_BeAl2O4

{
  "id": "n2_BeAl2O4",
  "material": "BeAl2O4",
  "file": "BeAl2O4/adair_1989__n2_BeAl2O4.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘BeAl_2O_4’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_BeAl2O4

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_BeAl2O4",
  "material": "BeAl2O4",
  "file": "BeAl2O4/adair_1989__n2_bgo_BeAl2O4.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘BeAl_2O_4’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_MgAl2O4

{
  "id": "n2_MgAl2O4",
  "material": "MgAl2O4",
  "file": "MgAl2O4/adair_1989__n2_MgAl2O4.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘MgAl_2O_4’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_MgAl2O4

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_MgAl2O4",
  "material": "MgAl2O4",
  "file": "MgAl2O4/adair_1989__n2_bgo_MgAl2O4.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘MgAl_2O_4’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CaMgSi2O6

{
  "id": "n2_CaMgSi2O6",
  "material": "CaMgSi2O6",
  "file": "CaMgSi2O6/adair_1989__n2_CaMgSi2O6.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaMgSi_2O_6’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_YAlO3_gamma

{
  "id": "n2_YAlO3_gamma",
  "material": "YAlO3",
  "file": "YAlO3/adair_1989__n2_YAlO3_gamma.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, the paper's '(gamma)'",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘YAlO_3 (γ)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_YAlO3_gamma

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_YAlO3_gamma",
  "material": "YAlO3",
  "file": "YAlO3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_YAlO3_gamma.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "polarization": "the paper's '(gamma)'"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘YAlO_3 (γ)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_YAG

{
  "id": "n2_YAG",
  "material": "YAG",
  "file": "YAG/adair_1989__n2_YAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Y_3Al_5O_{12} (YAG)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_YAG

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_YAG",
  "material": "YAG",
  "file": "YAG/adair_1989__n2_bgo_YAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Y_3Al_5O_{12} (YAG)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_GSAG

{
  "id": "n2_GSAG",
  "material": "GSAG",
  "file": "GSAG/adair_1989__n2_GSAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Gd_3Sc_2Al_3O_{12} (GSAG)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_GSAG

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_GSAG",
  "material": "GSAG",
  "file": "GSAG/adair_1989__n2_bgo_GSAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Gd_3Sc_2Al_3O_{12} (GSAG)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_GSGG

{
  "id": "n2_GSGG",
  "material": "GSGG",
  "file": "GSGG/adair_1989__n2_GSGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Gd_3Sc_2Ga_3O_{12} (GSGG)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_GSGG

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_GSGG",
  "material": "GSGG",
  "file": "GSGG/adair_1989__n2_bgo_GSGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Gd_3Sc_2Ga_3O_{12} (GSGG)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_GGG

{
  "id": "n2_GGG",
  "material": "GGG",
  "file": "GGG/adair_1989__n2_GGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Gd_3Ga_5O_{12} (GGG)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_GGG

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_GGG",
  "material": "GGG",
  "file": "GGG/adair_1989__n2_bgo_GGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Gd_3Ga_5O_{12} (GGG)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_YGG

{
  "id": "n2_YGG",
  "material": "YGG",
  "file": "YGG/adair_1989__n2_YGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Y_3Ga_5O_{12} (YGG)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_YGG

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_YGG",
  "material": "YGG",
  "file": "YGG/adair_1989__n2_bgo_YGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘Y_3Ga_5O_{12} (YGG)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_LLGG

{
  "id": "n2_LLGG",
  "material": "LLGG",
  "file": "LLGG/adair_1989__n2_LLGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘La_3Lu_2Ga_3O_{12} (LLGG)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_LLGG

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_LLGG",
  "material": "LLGG",
  "file": "LLGG/adair_1989__n2_bgo_LLGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘La_3Lu_2Ga_3O_{12} (LLGG)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_SrTiO3

{
  "id": "n2_SrTiO3",
  "material": "SrTiO3",
  "file": "SrTiO3/adair_1989__n2_SrTiO3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SrTiO_3’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_SrTiO3

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_SrTiO3",
  "material": "SrTiO3",
  "file": "SrTiO3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_SrTiO3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘SrTiO_3’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CaCO3_o

{
  "id": "n2_CaCO3_o",
  "material": "CaCO3",
  "file": "CaCO3/adair_1989__n2_CaCO3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaCO_3 (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CaCO3_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CaCO3_o",
  "material": "CaCO3",
  "file": "CaCO3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CaCO3_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaCO_3 (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CaCO3_e

{
  "id": "n2_CaCO3_e",
  "material": "CaCO3",
  "file": "CaCO3/adair_1989__n2_CaCO3_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "e",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaCO_3 (e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CaCO3_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CaCO3_e",
  "material": "CaCO3",
  "file": "CaCO3/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CaCO3_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_55822e89640f",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3342), row ‘CaCO_3 (e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_KDP_o

{
  "id": "n2_KDP_o",
  "material": "KDP",
  "file": "KDP/adair_1989__n2_KDP_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘KH2PO4(o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_KDP_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_KDP_o",
  "material": "KDP",
  "file": "KDP/adair_1989__n2_bgo_KDP_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘KH2PO4(o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_KDP_e

{
  "id": "n2_KDP_e",
  "material": "KDP",
  "file": "KDP/adair_1989__n2_KDP_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "e",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘KH2PO4(e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_KDP_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_KDP_e",
  "material": "KDP",
  "file": "KDP/adair_1989__n2_bgo_KDP_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘KH2PO4(e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_KTP_xy

{
  "id": "n2_KTP_xy",
  "material": "KTP",
  "file": "KTP/adair_1989__n2_KTP_xy.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, the paper's '(x+y)'",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘K(TiO)PO4(x+y)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_KTP_xy

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_KTP_xy",
  "material": "KTP",
  "file": "KTP/adair_1989__n2_bgo_KTP_xy.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "polarization": "the paper's '(x+y)'"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘K(TiO)PO4(x+y)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_LAP_y

{
  "id": "n2_LAP_y",
  "material": "LAP",
  "file": "LAP/adair_1989__n2_LAP_y.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "y",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘L-arginine phosphate (y)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_LAP_y

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_LAP_y",
  "material": "LAP",
  "file": "LAP/adair_1989__n2_bgo_LAP_y.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "y"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘L-arginine phosphate (y)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_LAP_xz

{
  "id": "n2_LAP_xz",
  "material": "LAP",
  "file": "LAP/adair_1989__n2_LAP_xz.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, the paper's '(x+z)'",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘L-arginine phosphate (x+z)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_LAP_xz

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_LAP_xz",
  "material": "LAP",
  "file": "LAP/adair_1989__n2_bgo_LAP_xz.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "polarization": "the paper's '(x+z)'"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘L-arginine phosphate (x+z)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_KTaO3

{
  "id": "n2_KTaO3",
  "material": "KTaO3",
  "file": "KTaO3/adair_1989__n2_KTaO3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘KTaO3’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_CaWO4_o

{
  "id": "n2_CaWO4_o",
  "material": "CaWO4",
  "file": "CaWO4/adair_1989__n2_CaWO4_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CaWO4(o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CaWO4_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CaWO4_o",
  "material": "CaWO4",
  "file": "CaWO4/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CaWO4_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CaWO4(o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CaWO4_e

{
  "id": "n2_CaWO4_e",
  "material": "CaWO4",
  "file": "CaWO4/adair_1989__n2_CaWO4_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "e",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CaWO4(e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CaWO4_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CaWO4_e",
  "material": "CaWO4",
  "file": "CaWO4/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CaWO4_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CaWO4(e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_ZnS_e

{
  "id": "n2_ZnS_e",
  "material": "ZnS",
  "file": "ZnS/adair_1989__n2_ZnS_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, the paper's '(e)'",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘ZnS (e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes). The row is labelled (e)/(o), so Adair’s ZnS was hexagonal (wurtzite); the registered ZnS is isotropic, so no axis is set.

adair_1989/n2_bgo_ZnS_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_ZnS_e",
  "material": "ZnS",
  "file": "ZnS/adair_1989__n2_bgo_ZnS_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "polarization": "the paper's '(e)'"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘ZnS (e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_ZnS_o

{
  "id": "n2_ZnS_o",
  "material": "ZnS",
  "file": "ZnS/adair_1989__n2_ZnS_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, the paper's '(o)'",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘ZnS (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes). The row is labelled (e)/(o), so Adair’s ZnS was hexagonal (wurtzite); the registered ZnS is isotropic, so no axis is set.

adair_1989/n2_bgo_ZnS_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_ZnS_o",
  "material": "ZnS",
  "file": "ZnS/adair_1989__n2_bgo_ZnS_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "polarization": "the paper's '(o)'"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘ZnS (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CdS_e

{
  "id": "n2_CdS_e",
  "material": "CdS",
  "file": "CdS/adair_1989__n2_CdS_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "e",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CdS (e)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CdS_e

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CdS_e",
  "material": "CdS",
  "file": "CdS/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CdS_e.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "e"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CdS (e)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_CdS_o

{
  "id": "n2_CdS_o",
  "material": "CdS",
  "file": "CdS/adair_1989__n2_CdS_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "primary",
  "uncertainty": {
    "relative": 0.05,
    "level": "not stated"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "axis": "o",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CdS (o)’, column ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’. TWM at 1.064/1.071 um, relative to a standard calibrated on Milam et al.’s TRI glasses (Refs. 15-18); nanosecond pulses (duration not stated here, see Ref. 19). Uncertainty: the stated relative accuracy, ‘better than 5%’ (‘on the order of 15%’ for KF, KCl, NaBr, KBr, CaO and SrO; p. 3340); the absolute scale carries the calibration set’s error (source notes).

adair_1989/n2_bgo_CdS_o

{
  "id": "n2_bgo_CdS_o",
  "material": "CdS",
  "file": "CdS/adair_1989__n2_bgo_CdS_o.csv",
  "table": "tbl_2e1f875bba6b",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "axis": "o"
  }
}

Table IV (p. 3343), row ‘CdS (o)’, column ‘Calculated n2 (10^-13 esu)’: the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Eq. (6), with K = 68 (p. 3341; formula bgo_k68), from the Abbe number and the index. A prediction, not a measurement; recorded at the measurement’s wavelength (the formula is a long-wavelength estimate). Part unknown: the formula models the electronic response, but K was fitted to measured (total) values.

adair_1989/n2_offset_SF-58

{
  "id": "n2_offset_SF-58",
  "material": "SF-58",
  "file": "SF-58/adair_1989__n2_offset_SF-58.csv",
  "table": "tbl_c3b6ccc6cfdc",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "delta": "cm-1"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), pump 1.064 um, offset Delta per row",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table I (p. 3340), ‘Measured values of n2 as a function of frequency shift’: SF-58 lead glass at Delta = omega1 - omega2 = 63.5, 32.3, 19.8 and 9.8 cm^-1 (column delta), pump 1.064 um. A test of the method, not a result: ‘there is no dispersion to within the experimental accuracy of about 5%’ (p. 3339), showing that the finite offset (60 cm^-1 in the measurements) misses no Raman contribution of this glass, ‘which has vibrational excitations extending down below 100 cm^-1’. The CS2 column (a liquid, with the expected reorientational dispersion) is skipped.

adair_1989/n2_power_SF-58

{
  "id": "n2_power_SF-58",
  "material": "SF-58",
  "file": "SF-58/adair_1989__n2_power_SF-58.csv",
  "table": "tbl_0f4b0f5d826e",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "power": "kW"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table II (p. 3340), ‘Measured values of n2 as a function of intensity for SF-58 lead glass’: laser power 250, 75, 50 and 12 kW at 1.064 um (column power). A test of the method: ‘Even at intensities near the self-focusing threshold for this material, our measurements are independent of laser power, so we conclude that self-focusing does not affect our measurements’ (pp. 3339-3340). Footnote a: ‘The critical power for self-focusing is P_crit = c lambda^2/32 pi^2 n2 = 94 kW.’

adair_1989/n2_av_Al2O3

{
  "id": "n2_av_Al2O3",
  "material": "Al2O3",
  "file": "Al2O3/adair_1989__n2_av_Al2O3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "average over polarizations ('(av)', not defined)",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), column TWM^b (this work, 1.06/1.07 um), ‘Al2O3 1.25 (av)’. ‘(av)’ is not explained; it presumably averages polarizations, but Table IV’s Al2O3 values are 1.23 (o) and 1.30 (e), whose mean is 1.265, not 1.25. The other ‘(av)’ cells (LaF3 1.4, CeF3 1.3, YAG 2.7) equal Table IV’s single values and every other cell of this column repeats Table IV (checked by the script), so only this cell is recorded. Polarization unstated (an average).

adair_1989/n2_levenson_bloembergen_BaF2

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_bloembergen_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__n2_levenson_bloembergen_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4447 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^e 0.575/0.610 um, footnote e ‘Reference 23’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Levenson and co-workers’ TWM, ‘based on calcite as a standard, are roughly a factor of 3 larger than ours, except for CdF2’ (p. 3340); large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_lynch_BaF2

{
  "id": "n2_lynch_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__n2_lynch_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "R. T. Lynch, Jr., M. D. Levenson, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Lett. 50A, 61 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^f 0.575/0.592 um, footnote f ‘Reference 24’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_BaF2

{
  "id": "n2_tri_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__n2_tri_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_levenson_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_levenson_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-10, 110 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^g 0.560/0.590 um, footnote g ‘Reference 25’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_levenson_bloembergen_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_bloembergen_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_levenson_bloembergen_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4447 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^e 0.575/0.610 um, footnote e ‘Reference 23’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Levenson and co-workers’ TWM, ‘based on calcite as a standard, are roughly a factor of 3 larger than ours, except for CdF2’ (p. 3340); large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_lynch_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_lynch_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_lynch_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "R. T. Lynch, Jr., M. D. Levenson, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Lett. 50A, 61 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^f 0.575/0.592 um, footnote f ‘Reference 24’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_maker_terhune_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_maker_terhune_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_maker_terhune_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) [corrected values as cited in C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing, Delta = 992 cm^-1 (benzene calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^d 0.693/0.746 um, footnote d ‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’ (Maker and Terhune 1965 via C. C. Wang 1970); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Maker and Terhune ‘used a setup similar to ours with collinear phase matching and a large value of Delta equal to the 992-cm^-1 vibration of benzene, which was the calibration medium. These results are consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ (p. 3340). Large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_tri_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_tri_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_levenson_bloembergen_CdF2

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_bloembergen_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__n2_levenson_bloembergen_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4447 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^e 0.575/0.610 um, footnote e ‘Reference 23’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Levenson and co-workers’ TWM, ‘based on calcite as a standard, are roughly a factor of 3 larger than ours, except for CdF2’ (p. 3340); large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_lynch_CdF2

{
  "id": "n2_lynch_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__n2_lynch_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "R. T. Lynch, Jr., M. D. Levenson, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Lett. 50A, 61 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^f 0.575/0.592 um, footnote f ‘Reference 24’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_CdF2

{
  "id": "n2_tri_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__n2_tri_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_CeF3

{
  "id": "n2_tri_CeF3",
  "material": "CeF3",
  "file": "CeF3/adair_1989__n2_tri_CeF3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_maker_terhune_KBr

{
  "id": "n2_maker_terhune_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__n2_maker_terhune_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) [corrected values as cited in C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing, Delta = 992 cm^-1 (benzene calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^d 0.693/0.746 um, footnote d ‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’ (Maker and Terhune 1965 via C. C. Wang 1970); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Maker and Terhune ‘used a setup similar to ours with collinear phase matching and a large value of Delta equal to the 992-cm^-1 vibration of benzene, which was the calibration medium. These results are consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ (p. 3340). Large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_KBr

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_maker_terhune_KCl

{
  "id": "n2_maker_terhune_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__n2_maker_terhune_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) [corrected values as cited in C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing, Delta = 992 cm^-1 (benzene calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^d 0.693/0.746 um, footnote d ‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’ (Maker and Terhune 1965 via C. C. Wang 1970); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Maker and Terhune ‘used a setup similar to ours with collinear phase matching and a large value of Delta equal to the 992-cm^-1 vibration of benzene, which was the calibration medium. These results are consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ (p. 3340). Large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_KCl

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_LaF3

{
  "id": "n2_tri_LaF3",
  "material": "LaF3",
  "file": "LaF3/adair_1989__n2_tri_LaF3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_levenson_LiF

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n2_levenson_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-10, 110 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^g 0.560/0.590 um, footnote g ‘Reference 25’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_maker_terhune_LiF

{
  "id": "n2_maker_terhune_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n2_maker_terhune_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) [corrected values as cited in C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing, Delta = 992 cm^-1 (benzene calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^d 0.693/0.746 um, footnote d ‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’ (Maker and Terhune 1965 via C. C. Wang 1970); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Maker and Terhune ‘used a setup similar to ours with collinear phase matching and a large value of Delta equal to the 992-cm^-1 vibration of benzene, which was the calibration medium. These results are consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ (p. 3340). Large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_LiF

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_LiF

{
  "id": "n2_tri_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n2_tri_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_maker_terhune_MgO

{
  "id": "n2_maker_terhune_MgO",
  "material": "MgO",
  "file": "MgO/adair_1989__n2_maker_terhune_MgO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) [corrected values as cited in C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing, Delta = 992 cm^-1 (benzene calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^d 0.693/0.746 um, footnote d ‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’ (Maker and Terhune 1965 via C. C. Wang 1970); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Maker and Terhune ‘used a setup similar to ours with collinear phase matching and a large value of Delta equal to the 992-cm^-1 vibration of benzene, which was the calibration medium. These results are consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ (p. 3340). Large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_NaBr

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_NaBr",
  "material": "NaBr",
  "file": "NaBr/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_NaBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_maker_terhune_NaCl

{
  "id": "n2_maker_terhune_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__n2_maker_terhune_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) [corrected values as cited in C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing, Delta = 992 cm^-1 (benzene calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^d 0.693/0.746 um, footnote d ‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’ (Maker and Terhune 1965 via C. C. Wang 1970); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Maker and Terhune ‘used a setup similar to ours with collinear phase matching and a large value of Delta equal to the 992-cm^-1 vibration of benzene, which was the calibration medium. These results are consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ (p. 3340). Large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_NaCl

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_NaF

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_NaF

{
  "id": "n2_tri_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__n2_tri_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_levenson_SiO2

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_SiO2",
  "material": "SiO2",
  "file": "SiO2/adair_1989__n2_levenson_SiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-10, 110 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^g 0.560/0.590 um, footnote g ‘Reference 25’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_maker_terhune_SiO2

{
  "id": "n2_maker_terhune_SiO2",
  "material": "SiO2",
  "file": "SiO2/adair_1989__n2_maker_terhune_SiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965) [corrected values as cited in C. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970)]"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing, Delta = 992 cm^-1 (benzene calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^d 0.693/0.746 um, footnote d ‘Corrected values from Ref. 2 as cited in Ref. 28’ (Maker and Terhune 1965 via C. C. Wang 1970); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Maker and Terhune ‘used a setup similar to ours with collinear phase matching and a large value of Delta equal to the 992-cm^-1 vibration of benzene, which was the calibration medium. These results are consistently larger than ours by a factor of 2’ (p. 3340). Large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_SiO2

{
  "id": "n2_tri_SiO2",
  "material": "SiO2",
  "file": "SiO2/adair_1989__n2_tri_SiO2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "milam_1976"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated. The fused-silica value 0.95 is milam_1976’s (Table I: 0.95 +- 0.10 x 10^-13 esu, Dynasil 4000; agrees); the fluorides of this column equal weber_1978 Table 2’s reference-e values (Milam, Weber and Glass 1977) converted to esu.

adair_1989/n2_levenson_bloembergen_SrF2

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_bloembergen_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__n2_levenson_bloembergen_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4447 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^e 0.575/0.610 um, footnote e ‘Reference 23’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Levenson and co-workers’ TWM, ‘based on calcite as a standard, are roughly a factor of 3 larger than ours, except for CdF2’ (p. 3340); large-Delta TWM ‘is too large to include the vibrational contribution to chi(3) in most crystals and glasses’ (p. 3340): part electronic. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_lynch_SrF2

{
  "id": "n2_lynch_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__n2_lynch_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "R. T. Lynch, Jr., M. D. Levenson, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Lett. 50A, 61 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^f 0.575/0.592 um, footnote f ‘Reference 24’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_tri_SrF2

{
  "id": "n2_tri_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__n2_tri_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "D. Milam and M. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 2497 (1976)",
    "D. Milam, M. J. Weber, and A. J. Glass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 822 (1977)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "time-resolved interferometry (TRI)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TRI^c 1.06 um, footnote c ‘References 15 and 17’ (which value comes from which is not said); ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Adair et al.: TRI ‘automatically satisfies the condition Delta = 0 to within the bandwidth of the laser pulse’ (p. 3340); its pulse and the electrostrictive share are not stated here: part unknown. ‘Of the listed materials measured by TRI, only fused silica was included from among the set of glasses that were used for calibration ... (The crystals were not used for calibration since their orientations were unknown in the TRI experiments.)’ (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_levenson_YAG

{
  "id": "n2_levenson_YAG",
  "material": "YAG",
  "file": "YAG/adair_1989__n2_levenson_YAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "columns": {
    "omega2": "um"
  },
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "M. D. Levenson, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-10, 110 (1974)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "three-wave mixing (calcite calibration)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column TWM^g 0.560/0.590 um, footnote g ‘Reference 25’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. As for Levenson and Bloembergen (Ref. 23): calcite standard, large Delta, part electronic (p. 3340). Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_smith_pdf_YAG

{
  "id": "n2_smith_pdf_YAG",
  "material": "YAG",
  "file": "YAG/adair_1989__n2_smith_pdf_YAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_fbb684fc9121",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "reproduced",
  "reproduced_from": [
    "W. L. Smith, J. H. Bechtel, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 706 (1975)"
  ],
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "unknown",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "power-dependent focus (self-focusing and optical damage)"
  }
}

Table III (p. 3341), ‘Comparison of work with previously published results’, column PDF^h 1.06 um (power-dependent focus), footnote h ‘Reference 27’; ‘Measured n2 (10^-13 esu)’ as tabulated by Adair et al. (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>; whether they converted the originals’ conventions is not said). For a TWM column the abscissa is the first (pump) wavelength and the column omega2 the second. Smith et al. ‘extracted n2 from optical damage data in the presence of self-focusing. These measurements are less direct than the others because of the uncertain role that self-focusing plays in bulk optical damage’ (p. 3341). Part unknown. Orientation not stated.

adair_1989/n2_table8_BaF2

{
  "id": "n2_table8_BaF2",
  "material": "BaF2",
  "file": "BaF2/adair_1989__n2_table8_BaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_CaF2

{
  "id": "n2_table8_CaF2",
  "material": "CaF2",
  "file": "CaF2/adair_1989__n2_table8_CaF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_CaO

{
  "id": "n2_table8_CaO",
  "material": "CaO",
  "file": "CaO/adair_1989__n2_table8_CaO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Table VIII prints 5.07; Table IV gives 5.20 for CaO[100], and 5.07 is Table IV’s SrO[110] (images checked): Table VIII probably repeats SrO’s value by mistake, not decidable from the paper.

adair_1989/n2_table8_CdF2

{
  "id": "n2_table8_CdF2",
  "material": "CdF2",
  "file": "CdF2/adair_1989__n2_table8_CdF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_KBr

{
  "id": "n2_table8_KBr",
  "material": "KBr",
  "file": "KBr/adair_1989__n2_table8_KBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Table VIII prints 3.07; Table IV (and Table III) give 2.93 for KBr[100] (images checked): one of the two is a misprint, not decidable from the paper.

adair_1989/n2_table8_KCl

{
  "id": "n2_table8_KCl",
  "material": "KCl",
  "file": "KCl/adair_1989__n2_table8_KCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_KF

{
  "id": "n2_table8_KF",
  "material": "KF",
  "file": "KF/adair_1989__n2_table8_KF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_LiF

{
  "id": "n2_table8_LiF",
  "material": "LiF",
  "file": "LiF/adair_1989__n2_table8_LiF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_MgO

{
  "id": "n2_table8_MgO",
  "material": "MgO",
  "file": "MgO/adair_1989__n2_table8_MgO.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Table VIII prints 1.6, Table IV 1.61 (rounding).

adair_1989/n2_table8_NaBr

{
  "id": "n2_table8_NaBr",
  "material": "NaBr",
  "file": "NaBr/adair_1989__n2_table8_NaBr.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_NaCl

{
  "id": "n2_table8_NaCl",
  "material": "NaCl",
  "file": "NaCl/adair_1989__n2_table8_NaCl.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_NaF

{
  "id": "n2_table8_NaF",
  "material": "NaF",
  "file": "NaF/adair_1989__n2_table8_NaF.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_table8_SrF2

{
  "id": "n2_table8_SrF2",
  "material": "SrF2",
  "file": "SrF2/adair_1989__n2_table8_SrF2.csv",
  "table": "tbl_8652b8e99339",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self",
    "technique": "nearly degenerate three-wave mixing (TWM), 1.064 and 1.071 um, Delta = 60 cm^-1",
    "polarization": "linear, along [100], propagating along [001]",
    "form": "bulk"
  }
}

Table VIII (p. 3347), ‘Anisotropy of chi(3) of cubic crystals’, column n2 (10^-13 esu), footnote a ‘Polarization along [100], propagate down [001] axis’. The same measurement as Table IV’s row, repeated beside the chi1122/chi1111 ratios (source notes). Equal to Table IV’s [100] row.

adair_1989/n2_additivity_CaMgSi2O6

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_CaMgSi2O6",
  "material": "CaMgSi2O6",
  "file": "CaMgSi2O6/adair_1989__n2_additivity_CaMgSi2O6.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_GGG

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_GGG",
  "material": "GGG",
  "file": "GGG/adair_1989__n2_additivity_GGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_GSGG

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_GSGG",
  "material": "GSGG",
  "file": "GSGG/adair_1989__n2_additivity_GSGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_LLGG

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_LLGG",
  "material": "LLGG",
  "file": "LLGG/adair_1989__n2_additivity_LLGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_MgAl2O4

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_MgAl2O4",
  "material": "MgAl2O4",
  "file": "MgAl2O4/adair_1989__n2_additivity_MgAl2O4.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_SrTiO3

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_SrTiO3",
  "material": "SrTiO3",
  "file": "SrTiO3/adair_1989__n2_additivity_SrTiO3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_YAG

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_YAG",
  "material": "YAG",
  "file": "YAG/adair_1989__n2_additivity_YAG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_YAlO3

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_YAlO3",
  "material": "YAlO3",
  "file": "YAlO3/adair_1989__n2_additivity_YAlO3.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script). Polarization not stated (Table IV’s YAlO3 row is ‘(gamma)’).

adair_1989/n2_additivity_YGG

{
  "id": "n2_additivity_YGG",
  "material": "YGG",
  "file": "YGG/adair_1989__n2_additivity_YGG.csv",
  "table": "tbl_5192778e0ba3",
  "quantity": "nonlinear_index_field",
  "unit": "esu",
  "scale": 1e-13,
  "abscissa_unit": "um",
  "use": "check",
  "parameters": {
    "definition": "<E^2>, 'E is the applied optical electric field' (Eq. 1, p. 3337)",
    "part": "electronic_vibrational",
    "coefficient": "self"
  }
}

Table X (p. 3348), column ‘n2 (10^-13 esu) calculated from simple oxides’: Eq. (5) with the Lorentz local field and the sum of the cation-oxygen pair hyperpolarizabilities of Table IX (the caption says Table VII), assuming additivity; the average error against the measured values is about 13 % (p. 3348). A prediction; part as the measurements it is built from. The table’s measured column equals Table IV (checked by the script).

Formulas

adair_1989/bgo_k68

{
  "id": "bgo_k68",
  "equation": "Eq. (6), p. 3338 (the Boling-Glass-Owyoung formula, Ref. 5), with K = 68 (p. 3341)",
  "printed": "n_2 = K (n_d - 1)(n_d^2 + 2)^2 / { nu_d [1.517 + (n_d^2 + 2)(n_d + 1) nu_d / (6 n_d)]^(1/2) } x 10^-13 esu",
  "variable": "n_d: the linear index at the He d line, 5875.6 A; nu_d: the Abbe number; n2 in esu (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>)",
  "range": "low-index crystals and glasses; K = 68 'determined by a best fit to low-index glasses and fluoride crystals' (Refs. 5, 15-18)",
  "coefficients": {
    "K": "68",
    "a": "1.517",
    "scale": "1e-13"
  },
  "check": "Table IV's 'Calculated n2' column uses K = 68 (p. 3341). Evaluated with Table IV's n (1.06 um) in place of n_d (the paper does not print n_d), the formula gives values below the printed ones by a median of 4 % (calc/formula = 1.04; 33 of 48 rows within 6 %, 36 within 10 %; up to 1.38 for CdS (e), 1.29 ZnO (e), 1.25 TiO2, 1.23 LAP (x+z), 1.19 GSAG, SrTiO3; 0.90 YGG): consistent with n_d > n(1.06 um) for most rows; the large departures are high-dispersion crystals, where n_d and n(1.06 um) differ most. Not reproduced exactly (n_d not available). Checked 2026-09-26."
}

Relative to the measurements: measured/formula has a median of 0.76 with K = 68 and 1.08 with K = 48 (computed from Table IV with n(1.06 um); the paper says K = 48 ‘fits the entire set of data much better’, the oxides of Ti4+, Zr4+, W6+ lying ~40 % below even that line, p. 3341). The paper also rederived the formula with f = 1 (p. 3349): ‘not very different’.

adair_1989/bgo_k48

{
  "id": "bgo_k48",
  "equation": "Eq. (6), p. 3338, with K = 48 (the dashed line of Fig. 3, p. 3341)",
  "printed": "n_2 = K (n_d - 1)(n_d^2 + 2)^2 / { nu_d [1.517 + (n_d^2 + 2)(n_d + 1) nu_d / (6 n_d)]^(1/2) } x 10^-13 esu",
  "variable": "n_d: the linear index at the He d line, 5875.6 A; nu_d: the Abbe number; n2 in esu (n = n0 + n2 <E^2>)",
  "range": "the crystals of Table IV (fitted to the whole set; p. 3341)",
  "coefficients": {
    "K": "48",
    "a": "1.517",
    "scale": "1e-13"
  },
  "check": "No tabulated values use K = 48 (only Fig. 3's dashed line). The median of measured/formula over Table IV's 48 rows with an Abbe number is 1.08 when Table IV's n (1.06 um) stands for n_d (computed 2026-09-26)."
}

adair_1989/wilson_curtis_alpha

{
  "id": "wilson_curtis_alpha",
  "equation": "Eq. (15), p. 3345, with Table VI (tbl_8fbcb8f4b360, p. 3346), columns 'Theor.' (fits to Johnson et al.'s calculations, Ref. 12)",
  "printed": "alpha^- = alpha_0^- exp(-C / R^2)",
  "variable": "R: the nearest-neighbour (anion-cation) distance in angstrom; alpha in A^3",
  "coefficients": {
    "alpha0_F": "2.24",
    "C_F": "3.87",
    "alpha0_Cl": "5.50",
    "C_Cl": "4.36",
    "alpha0_Br": "7.24",
    "C_Br": "4.66",
    "alpha0_I": "10.5",
    "C_I": "5.41"
  },
  "check": "A fit to Table V's theoretical alpha- (Johnson et al.), not to measurements; not reproduced here (the NN distances of the alkali halides other than Table VII's fluorides are not printed). Table VI verified against its image."
}

adair_1989/wilson_curtis_gamma

{
  "id": "wilson_curtis_gamma",
  "equation": "Eq. (17), p. 3346, with Table VI (tbl_8fbcb8f4b360, p. 3346): gamma0 and D, 'Theor.' (fits to Johnson et al.'s gamma-, Ref. 12) and 'Expt.' (this work: fluorides of Table VII without CdF2, oxides of Table IX)",
  "printed": "gamma^- = gamma_0^- exp(-D / R^2)",
  "variable": "R: the nearest-neighbour (anion-cation) distance in angstrom; gamma in 10^-39 esu per formula unit (convention of Eq. 4); D in A^2",
  "coefficients": {
    "gamma0_F_theory": "4040",
    "D_F_theory": "11.3",
    "gamma0_Cl_theory": "16 100",
    "D_Cl_theory": "16.9",
    "gamma0_Br_theory": "24 400",
    "D_Br_theory": "18.6",
    "gamma0_I_theory": "47 500",
    "D_I_theory": "22.6",
    "gamma0_F_expt": "4950",
    "D_F_expt": "14.7",
    "gamma0_O_expt": "34 270",
    "D_O_expt": "18.3"
  },
  "check": "Evaluated at Table VII's separations with the F expt parameters (computed 2026-09-26): LiF 130 (Table VII 141), NaF 322 (320), Mg1/2F 121 (128), Ba1/2F 649 (626), La1/3F 471 (487), Ce1/3F 454 (440), but Ca1/2F 361 (282), Sr1/2F 480 (412), KF 630 (889), Cd1/2F 330 (1520; excluded from the fit, the square point of Fig. 5). With the O expt parameters at Table IX's separations: MgO 562 (485), CaO 1467 (1500), SrO 2192 (2290), Al2/3O 227 (248), Y2/3O 983 (945), Er2/3O 953 (1040), Zr1/2O 953 (650), and far below for the d-shell or covalent units (ZnO 322 vs 4850, Ti1/2O 292 vs 2520, Ga2/3O 353 vs 887, Sc2/3O 562 vs 920, Si1/2O 29 vs 510, BeO 41 vs 436), as the paper says (the 'rounded data points' only, p. 3348). The paper states D = 18.29 in the text (p. 3348) and 18.3 in Table VI. Coefficients with a thin space printed as '16 100', '24 400', '47 500', '34 270'."
}

The model predicts D = 2C (p. 3346); the paper finds D/C = 3.7 on average for the theory fits.

Corrections

No dataset errata are recorded in this source record.

Formula corrections, where recorded, appear with their formulas above. Curation notes may also discuss corrections or unresolved interpretation. Consult the review register for the checks and decisions.