chan_1993_erratum ================= W\. F\. Chan, G\. Cooper, X\. Guo, G\. R\. Burton, and C\. E\. Brion, "Erratum\: Absolute optical oscillator strengths for the electronic excitation of atoms at high resolution\. III\. The photoabsorption of argon, krypton, and xenon \[Phys\. Rev\. A 46, 149 \(1992\)\]", Phys\. Rev\. A 48, 858 \(1993\) `Source record `__ · :doc:`Catalogue ` · :doc:`Review register ` DOI: `10\.1103/physreva\.48\.858 `__ **Source kind:** measurement **Recorded technique:** The authors' erratum to chan\_1992 \(dipole \(e,e\) oscillator strengths of Ar, Kr and Xe\)\: Tables V, VII and IX reprinted whole; no new measurement is described\. **Materials in structured entries:** None recorded. **Dataset quantities:** None recorded. **Contents:** 0 datasets; 0 formulas. Curation notes -------------- Journal pp\. 858\-860 \(PDF pages 1\-3; the third page also carries an unrelated erratum by another author, on affiliations only\)\. The whole text\: 'Some values in Tables V, VII, and IX were incorrectly positioned\. The tables are reproduced below in their entireties' \(p\. 858\)\. Identity and authors checked against the page images \(2026\-09\-29\)\. Nothing is taken here as a dataset\: the reprinted tables repeat chan\_1992's Tables V, VII and IX, and the corrections are applied to chan\_1992's datasets \(its \[\[errata\]\] and excluded\_rows\), so the measurement is recorded once\. Compared cell by cell \(library tables tbl\_73d8dcfe47d0 = V, tbl\_70b698d2df73 = VII\(a\), tbl\_3ba04aab3432 = VII\(b\), tbl\_2389d67b360e = IX\(a\), tbl\_60dfca332c57 = IX\(b\), images checked against chan\_1992's tbl\_699514709b3b, tbl\_0dd5fa4f52b5 and tbl\_1dbc4809ef5a\)\: WHAT IT CORRECTS\. Three rows print one value for an unresolved group of lines; the 1992 tables repeated it under each line of the group\. The reprint prints it once, centred under a brace spanning the group\: \- Table V\(b\), present work, argon\: 0\.0426 for 7s \(15\.186 eV\) and 5d\-underlined \(15\.190 eV\) together, uncertainty printed '0\.0063' \(without parentheses\) where 1992 printed 0\.0426\(0\.0043\) in both columns\. The 'Total to ionization' is reprinted 0\.859 \(0\.043\), confirming chan\_1992's erratum of the printed \(0\.0043\)\. \- Table VII\(b\), Geiger \[82\] electron impact, krypton\: 0\.187 for 5d\-underlined \(13\.099\) and 7s \(13\.114 eV\) together, 0\.054 for 6d\-underlined \(13\.423\) and 8s \(13\.437 eV\) together \(1992\: each printed in both columns\)\. \- Table IX\(b\), Delage and Carette \[81\] electron impact, xenon\: 0\.251 for 9s \(11\.583\) and 5d' \(11\.607 eV\) together, 0\.171 for 8d \(11\.683\), 8d\-underlined \(11\.740\) and 10s \(11\.752 eV\) together \(1992\: in every column of each group\)\. The braces are drawn under Geiger's row, above Delage and Carette's; Geiger's six values stay in their own columns\. WHAT IT LEAVES UNCHANGED\. Sub\-tables V\(a\), VII\(a\) and IX\(a\), and every other row of the \(b\) sub\-tables, are reprinted with the same values in the same columns\. In particular Wiese, Smith and Miles's 3d' value \(14\.304 eV\) is reprinted 0\.0106\: chan\_1992's erratum of it \(to 0\.106\) rests on the table's own evidence, not on this erratum\. The reprint's own misprints of names \('Greiger' in VII\(a\); 'Mielczarek and Mielczarek'; 'Delgage'; 'Natali, Kuyatt, and Garrett' kept from 1992\) touch no value\. Where 1992 printed 'Miekzarek' the reprint prints 'Mielczarek' \(the correct spelling\)\. DOUBT\: the argon blend's new uncertainty 0\.0063 is 15 % of 0\.0426, against the 10 % of every other non\-resonance line; it is printed without parentheses, perhaps a typesetting slip for \(0\.0063\) or for \(0\.0043\)\. Taken as printed \(TC\-710\)\. **Recorded bibliographic identity status:** VALIDATED\_WITH\_WARNINGS. This concerns identification of the source; it does not establish the scientific correctness of its contents. Datasets -------- No datasets are recorded. Formulas -------- No formulas are recorded. Corrections ----------- No dataset errata are recorded in this source record. Formula corrections, where recorded, appear with their formulas above. Curation notes may also discuss corrections or unresolved interpretation. Consult the :doc:`review register ` for the checks and decisions.